Get a Custom Essay Paper that meets your expectations by clicking ORDER
Persuasive Argument on an Ethical Issue
Purpose: You will learn how to write a persuasive argument regarding an ethical issue.
Outcome Met by Completing This Assignment:
1. Identify ethical issues that arise in domestic and global business environments using an understanding of ethical concepts and of legal and business principles
2. Develop and evaluate alternatives to, and recommend solutions for, ethical dilemmas, taking into account ethical and legal requirements and the essential mission of the business enterprise
3. Effectively communicate to internal and external business stakeholders the complexities of ethical issues suggesting and analyzing various solutions in order to ensure appropriate business practices and accountability Instructions:
NOTE: All submitted work is to be your original work. You may not use any work from another student, the Internet or an online clearinghouse. You are expected to understand the Academic Dishonesty and Plagiarism Policy, and know that it is your responsibility to learn about instructor and general academic expectations with regard to proper citation of sources as specified in the APA Publication Manual, 6th Ed. (Students are held accountable for in-text citations and an associated reference list only).
Persuasive Argument on an Ethical Issue
Step 1: Getting Started
A position paper provides a point of view and can be view as taking a side in a debate. What you want to keep in mind as you research and write the paper is that the viewpoint is yours but it is necessary to support your ideas, reasoning and conclusions.
Before starting, read the topic in Step 4 and lay out a plan for researching the topic. You will note that you have been given a few articles to get you started but the research you will do goes beyond these articles and must focus on identifying the ethical issue and taking a stance based on the ethical nature of the statement.
To present a fair and convincing argument, you will research and present the counterclaims to the position you take and refute the other positions.
Step 2: Read the articles below to gain a sense of the issue at stake. Research the issue further so that you are able to take a position.
Nestlé CEO: Water Is Not a Human Right, Should Be Privatized
Nestlé’s Attempt to Completely Privatize (Steal) Water in Oregon Put to a Stop: “Our Water, Our Future”
Nestlé’s Peter Braback: Our Attitude Towards Water Needs to Change
Persuasive Argument on an Ethical Issue
Step 3: Create the introductory paragraph.
Within this paragraph, provide a brief overview of the scenario. Then, provide a thesis statement and tell the reader the main topics covered in the paper. The introduction comes at the beginning of the paper and tells a reader the main topics covered in the paper. View this website to learn how to write an introductory paragraph: http://www.writing.ucsb.edu/faculty/donelan/intro.html
Step 4: You will write a position paper in response to the quote below:
To write a position paper, you will first organize and outline the counterclaims and your viewpoints on the issue. Be sure to frame the discussion to define the key points covered in the paper. Establish credibility by supporting the reasoning and conclusions using the course readings and your research.
Quote: “Water is not a right for all humans and; therefore, can become the property of a business.”
Persuasive Argument on an Ethical Issue
Step 5: Writing Steps
- Use the topic provided in Step 6
- Gather sources using the library, the classroom and the Internet (scholarly articles). Make sure that you have information that supports more than one viewpoint.
- Read the source documents and decide on a claim statement. The claim statement is the thesis of your paper.
- Use the gathered sources to prepare the thesis.
- Consider preparing an outline based on the steps provided in Step 2.
- Identifying the ethical issue.
- Present the counterclaims, your position on the counterclaims including evidence to refute the counterarguments.
- Then, write your paper by presenting your position. Argue your position by making three appropriate reasons with at least two supporting details for each reason;
- Lastly, conclude the paper by restating/summarizing the argument. Refer to the opening statements and main points made throughout the paper. Reflect on the importance of the arguments and conclude their development.
Persuasive Argument on an Ethical Issue
Step 6: Proofread the paper for spelling and grammatical issues and third person writing as this assignment requires college-level writing.
- Use the spell and grammar check in Word as a first measure;
- Have someone who has excellent English skills to proof the paper;
- Consider submitting the paper to the Effective Writing Center (EWC). The EWC will provide 4-6 areas that may need improvement.
Step 7: Submit the paper in the Assignment Folder (The assignment submitted to the Assignment Folder will be considered a student’s final product and therefore ready for grading by the instructor. It is incumbent upon the student to verify the assignment is the correct submission. No exceptions will be considered by the instructor).
Persuasive Argument on an Ethical Issue
Preparation for the Assignment
- Before you begin writing the assignment, you will read the following requirements that will help you meet the writing and APA requirements. Not reading this information will lead to a lower grade:
- Read the grading rubric for the assignment. Use the grading rubric while writing the report to ensure all requirements are met that will lead to the highest possible grade.
- Third person writing is required. Third person means that there are no words such as “I, me, my, we, or us” (first person writing), nor is there use of “you or your” (second person writing). If uncertain how to write in the third person, view this link: http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/first-second-and-third-person.
- Contractions are not used in business writing, so you are expected NOT to use contractions in writing this assignment.
- You are expected to paraphrase and NOT use direct quotes. You are expected to paraphrase, which can be learned by reviewing this link: https://writing.wisc.edu/Handbook/QPA_paraphrase2.html
- You are responsible for APA only for in-text citations and a reference list.
- You are expected to use the facts from the case scenario paired with the weekly courses readings to develop the analysis and support the reasoning. Books cannot be used as resources for this assignment. The expectation is that you use of the course readings and that research is done on the topic. If any material is used from a source document, it must be cited and referenced and the page or paragraph number must be provided. A reference within a reference list cannot exist without an associated in-text citation and vice versa. View the sample APA paper to gain better understanding of how to use APA within the paper.
Persuasive Argument on an Ethical Issue
Below is a partial answer to the above homework questions by one of our writers. If you are interested in a custom non plagiarized top quality answer, click order now to place your order.
Persuasive Argument on an Ethical Issue
Should Water be Privatized?
Introduction
According to Nestle’s former CEO Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, water should be privatized because it is not a human right. This claim provides that individuals should not have access to water unless they purchase it from corporations-which should take ownership of all the planet’s water. This topic is of great interest because the statement by Brabeck-Letmathe has been faced by numerous criticism, with proponents suggesting that privatization would lead to better control of the scarce resource while opponents believe that privatization of water is a violation of human rights.
According to Brown (2016), the cost of bottled water continues to rise due to hidden costs required in the production and bottling of water, yet the same quality of water can be accessed from taps free of charge. They note that a global water crisis is looming due to the rising population and corporations are taking advantage of the rising demand for water to enhance their profitability. Nestle for example has been acquiring more water plants and increasing production of bottled water. Increased extraction of water by corporations could result in increased drought and monopolization by large corporations, thus leading to increased water prices.
Water is a human right and natural resource, whose commercialization would only benefit corporations at the expense of the population. Water is considered a basic need, hence the saying that ‘water is life.’ No human being, whether is capable of operating without water for the various needs including drinking, cooking and cleaning. Privatizing water would create a major wealth gap in the world by limiting access to water only to those who can afford.
This position paper aims at demonstrating that water should be treated as a basic right. To achieve this, various topics are covered including water as a human right, ethics of water privatization, enhancing water control through private corporations, customer exploitation by water corporations and the impact of water privatization on the environment and possible.
Counter arguments
Water is not a basic right
The first argument presented for privatization of water is that water is not a human right and that corporations should take control of the resource to promote effective distribution. According to claims by Nestle’s former CEO Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, corporations should control water resources, such that households would need to buy water. In this argument, water is considered like a commodity for which individuals would have to purchase in order to access (Gucciardi, 2013).
Refuting this argument, it is notable that water is a human right and every individual despite their financial background has a right to access safe water for drinking and domestic use. Water is considered a basic human need which should be accessed by all in order to promote survival (UN, 2017). Privatization would lead to corporations exploiting the business of water, thus making it unaffordable for common citizens, and thus denying them their human right (Murthy, 2013). Given the current shortage of water due to global warming, a further increase in price would be a hindering factor to water access across the globe.
It would be unreasonable to subject people to buying water through privatizing water resources, when it can be freely accessible. The utilitarian theory provides that the consequences associated with particular actions determine the morality of the action, such that the action producing the most benefits compared to harm are considered moral (Wireless Philosophy, 2014).
Taking the case of water privatization, the overall impact would be discrimination and poor wealth distribution because the poor would not be able to afford water. While privatization is thought to enhance the management of water resources, it is more harmful because it deprives the population of a basic need. Based on the utilitarian theory, privatizing water is immoral and thereby unethical.
Privatization can promote effective management of the scarce commodity
The second argument is that water has become increasingly scarce due to climatic changes and by having a control mechanism, this will ensure that water is better managed and distributed, thus avoiding wastage (Segerfeldt, 2017). To support this view, it is notable that a significant amount of water is lost when it flows freely into peoples’ taps and regulating its consumption would play a role in conserving water. Individuals would have to buy water and this would tame their consumption.
This argument presents a lopsided approach to solving the water scarcity issue. The solution should not be to sell water but to encourage people to conserve water through reduced consumption. The government could also ration water, such that only a certain amount of water is pumped to peoples’ homes per day. Limiting consumption per house would work better than selling water, which may sideline those who are financially challenged.
Argument
Water is a human right
Water is a human right and should be treated as such, with individuals being in a position to access water at any time without exploitation. Accordingly, the government must work towards ensuring that individuals have access to water and that availability is not discriminated based on income or background. The United Nations General Assembly on July 28, 2010 declared water and sanitation as human rights through Resolution 64/292 (UN, 2017). According to the UN General Assembly, access to water and sanitation constitute a basic need in human rights realization, such that governments and international organizations were called upon to provide assistance to developing countries to access clean, safe, affordable and accessible drinking water.
The UN recognizes that in the quest to meet millennium development goals (MDG’s), ensuring human right to water is essential and governments have a role to play in goal. By extending the right for corporations to own all water resources and sell the water to people, governments would not only be abandoning their role but also exposing citizens to human rights infringement (Murthy, 2013). Due to the high costs of purchasing water, the commodity would no longer be affordable nor sufficient, which qualities considered imperative to satisfying the human right to water.
The suggested cost of water by UNDP is less than 3 per cent of household income while 50 to 100 litres of water are required per day for every person to effectively meet their domestic and personal uses (UN, 2017). Accordingly, purchasing water would limit attainment of such goals to a significant level…..
Persuasive Argument on an Ethical Issue
Get a Custom Essay Paper that meets your expectations by clicking ORDER
