Want help to write your Essay or Assignments? Click here
Nonverbal communication in a situation comedy
Nonverbal communication involves the use of stimulus and not a speech to pass the message to the audience. It is non-linguistic, associated with intended symbolic actions and entails nonverbal conducts purposely sent and considered to have consequential significance.
In the Sit-Com comedy, it starts with a knock on the door, which is commonly recognized as an indication of the presence of someone. In addition, Sheldon states that “I should note I’m having some digestive distress” while touching his abdomen. This is to emphasize what he said orally- he has digestive pain.
Penny says “He wiped his mouth with it,” while her hands move around her mouth, showing the action of someone wiping his/her mouth. There is also a scene where Leonard knows that Sheldon was deceitful about his sickness; he shook the head to indicate defeat or to give up. Leonard gives up regarding Sheldon’s behavior. Sheldon also slaps his hands in his face to illustrate calmness while thinking about the solution to the present condition. These are instances of kinesics.
Want help to write your Essay or Assignments? Click here
Sheldon said “Oh!” when she saw the gift. The tone is heightened significantly to show that he was amazed, although since it does not sound real, it is clear to viewers that he was faking it. Penny yelled “Sheldon! What are you doing?”. Similarly, there is a change in the tone. Such changes indicate Penny’s feeling upon seeing the gifts. At the end of the comedy, Sheldon hugs Penny, thinking that his gifts were not of relevance to the napkin Penny gave him.
Apparently, Sheldon does like hugging people, as they are not only awkward but makes him uncomfortable. However, he hugged Penny. According to Haptics that involves the study of touch in communication, touch enhances the positive relationships, demonstrates intimacy and friendship, which is why he hugged Penny. The forms of nonverbal communication in Sit-Com reflects the usual roles as well as various forms of nonverbal communication
Want help to write your Essay or Assignments? Click here
Communication strategies in the movie Crash by Paul Haggis
Intercultural communication, verbal communication, perception, and stereotyping all play essential roles in the characteristics of the movie Crash. This paper provides a detailed critique of Paul Haggis’ film Crash. In this evaluation, connections are made to what I have learned in class with regard to communication.
The concepts/principles of listening and stereotyping are clearly defined and applied in the film. Thesis statement:in Crash, people stereotype and judge other people and they also get judged by other people and this results in ineffective communication. Ineffective listening by some characters in the movie also results in poor communication.
Communication strategies
Stereotyping
Stereotypes refer to the beliefs or perceptions that people hold about other people or groups rooted in previously formed attitudes and views. When people are categorized as a group, they are believed to possess comparatively similar beliefs and exhibit the same behaviors (Beebe, 2011). On the whole, stereotypes describe the behavior norm for a specific group, and not individual behavior.
In the film Crash by Paul Haggis, instances of stereotyping are many. In the initial scene of this film, the Korean lady yelled at detective Ria that Mexican people do not know how to drive – she stereotypes Mexican people. Conversely, people of Korean descent often have trouble in pronouncing some consonants rightly: the Korean lady pronounces brake as blake and she was mocked satirically by Ria who told her, I am sorry you never saw my blake lights.
Communication strategies
Want help to write your Essay or Assignments? Click here
Following the 9/11 terrorist attacks on American soil, the entire society of the United States has some kind of hatred toward the Arabs as they have developed some stereotypes about Arabs. Americans believe that every Arab person could be a potential terrorist.
Other stereotypes depicted in Crash are that black people are the source of crime in American society, Caucasians do not really understand hip-hop, African Americans do not like ice-skating, country songs, or playing hockey. Nonetheless, Anthony finds it weird that Peter as an African American likes hockey, ice-skating, and country songs.
Stereotyping has embedded deeply in the minds of both African Americans and Caucasians and it embarrasses and torments them. People think that they actually know who they are. Nonetheless, when they are tested, they come to the realization that they have no idea who they are. On the whole, people stereotype and judge other people and they also get judged by other people.
When their mindsets crash into one another, they eventually understand that they cannot escape unscathed. Stereotyping has been ineffective as depicted in the film Crash as it served as an obstacle to effective cross-cultural communication. In essence, whether subtle or blatant, stereotyping could have a very negative effect on human interaction and communication as shown in the movie Crash.
Communication strategies
Want help to write your Essay or Assignments? Click here
Listening
Listening refers to the capability of accurately receiving and interpreting messages in the process of communication. It is worth mentioning that listening is crucial to any effective communication given that without the ability to listen in an effective way, messages would be misunderstood easily – communication will break down and the message’s sender or speaker could become irritated or frustrated easily (Beebe, 2011).
The concept of listening as a strategy for intercultural communication has also been rather ineffective as used in the film Crash. One of the main characters in the film is John Ryan who is a white police officer. He is a racist toward African Americans. His quotes captivate the viewers and he happens not to be a very good listener. When a person does not listen effectively to what the other person is saying, then the individual leaves himself and his mind open to believe anything and in most instances misunderstands the point the other party was trying to say.
Furthermore, people have the tendency of presuming what the other person is trying to say without allowing them to really finish speaking what they were saying. This could result in confusion between the two causing them to jump to conclusions. In Crash, ineffective listening or not listening to others effectively could end in serious irreversible outcomes.
Communication strategies
Want help to write your Essay or Assignments? Click here
Conclusion
To sum up, this essay has examined the principles of stereotype and listening as depicted in the film Crash which was directed by Paul Haggis. In this award-winning movie, characters stereotype and judge each other and they also get stereotyped and judged by others. This caused ineffective communication. Furthermore, poor listening by some people in this film led to poor communication and misunderstanding.
Want help to write your Essay or Assignments? Click here
Crash by Paul Haggis: Movie Review
Communication strategies in the movie Crash by Paul Haggis
Intercultural communication, verbal communication, perception, and stereotyping all play essential roles in the characteristics of the movie Crash. This paper provides a detailed critique of Paul Haggis’ film Crash. In this evaluation, connections are made to what I have learned in class with regard to communication.
The concepts/principles of listening and stereotyping are clearly defined and applied in the film. Thesis statement:in Crash, people stereotype and judge other people and they also get judged by other people and this results in ineffective communication. Ineffective listening by some characters in the movie also results in poor communication.
Stereotyping
Stereotypes refer to the beliefs or perceptions that people hold about other people or groups rooted in previously formed attitudes and views. When people are categorized as a group, they are believed to possess comparatively similar beliefs and exhibit the same behaviors (Beebe, 2011). On the whole, stereotypes describe the behavior norm for a specific group, and not individual behavior.
In the film Crash by Paul Haggis, instances of stereotyping are many. In the initial scene of this film, the Korean lady yelled at detective Ria that Mexican people do not know how to drive – she stereotypes Mexican people. Conversely, people of Korean descent often have trouble in pronouncing some consonants rightly: the Korean lady pronounces brake as blake and she was mocked satirically by Ria who told her, I am sorry you never saw my blake lights.
Want help to write your Essay or Assignments? Click here
Following the 9/11 terrorist attacks on American soil, the entire society of the United States has some kind of hatred toward the Arabs as they have developed some stereotypes about Arabs. Americans believe that every Arab person could be a potential terrorist.
Other stereotypes depicted in Crash are that black people are the source of crime in American society, Caucasians do not really understand hip-hop, African Americans do not like ice-skating, country songs, or playing hockey. Nonetheless, Anthony finds it weird that Peter as an African American likes hockey, ice-skating, and country songs.
Stereotyping has embedded deeply in the minds of both African Americans and Caucasians and it embarrasses and torments them. People think that they actually know who they are. Nonetheless, when they are tested, they come to the realization that they have no idea who they are. On the whole, people stereotype and judge other people and they also get judged by other people.
When their mindsets crash into one another, they eventually understand that they cannot escape unscathed. Stereotyping has been ineffective as depicted in the film Crash as it served as an obstacle to effective cross-cultural communication. In essence, whether subtle or blatant, stereotyping could have a very negative effect on human interaction and communication as shown in the movie Crash.
Want help to write your Essay or Assignments? Click here
Listening
Listening refers to the capability of accurately receiving and interpreting messages in the process of communication. It is worth mentioning that listening is crucial to any effective communication given that without the ability to listen in an effective way, messages would be misunderstood easily – communication will break down and the message’s sender or speaker could become irritated or frustrated easily (Beebe, 2011).
The concept of listening as a strategy for intercultural communication has also been rather ineffective as used in the film Crash. One of the main characters in the film is John Ryan who is a white police officer. He is a racist toward African Americans. His quotes captivate the viewers and he happens not to be a very good listener. When a person does not listen effectively to what the other person is saying, then the individual leaves himself and his mind open to believe anything and in most instances misunderstands the point the other party was trying to say.
Furthermore, people have the tendency of presuming what the other person is trying to say without allowing them to really finish speaking what they were saying. This could result in confusion between the two causing them to jump to conclusions. In Crash, ineffective listening or not listening to others effectively could end in serious irreversible outcomes.
Want help to write your Essay or Assignments? Click here
Conclusion
To sum up, this essay has examined the principles of stereotype and listening as depicted in the film Crash which was directed by Paul Haggis. In this award-winning movie, characters stereotype and judge each other and they also get stereotyped and judged by others. This caused ineffective communication. Furthermore, poor listening by some people in this film led to poor communication and misunderstanding.
Want help to write your Essay or Assignments? Click here
Infernal affairs: Literature & Language Movie Review
INSTRUCTIONS:
It should be written a 600-800 word analysis about the narration of the movie Infernal Affairs (2002).
The only thing to be reviewed/analyzed is the narration of the movie. Please concentrate only on that.
The movie is a Hong Kong crime film from 2002.
Storyline
Chan Wing Yan, a young police officer, has been sent undercover as a mole in the local mafia. Lau Kin Ming, a young mafia member, infiltrates the police force. Years later, their older counterparts, Chen Wing Yan and Inspector Lau Kin Ming, respectively, race against time to expose the mole within their midst. —Aya
Want help to write your Essay or Assignments? Click here
This Visual & Performing Arts Film Analysis paper should be analyzing film. Choose one pivotal scene in the film to analyze, the scene should be anywhere from two-to-five-minutes in length.
Movies transport us. They take us to different times and places, bringing laughter in one moment and tears in the next. But no matter how outlandish the plot, at their core movies examine the human condition. We tell stories about ourselves to ourselves, even if the characters are ostensibly aliens or animals or fuzzy monsters. They are based on realities we can learn from.
So while no real-life courtroom may be run like a movie courtroom, there are plenty of deeper truths woven into screenplays and plenty of lessons to be learned—even when we’re looking for entertainment, not an education.
With that in mind, we’ve put together a collection of pivotal movie scenes that have useful takeaways for lawyers. Grab some popcorn and enjoy! (Warning: Spoilers abound.)
Want help to write your Essay or Assignments? Click here
• Spend at least 2 uninterrupted hours navigating through the virtual exhibition. There are 12 sections, each with several images, labels, and videos. Spend time getting oriented to the virtual space and engaging with the material. Take notes on what you notice. What stands out to you? What draws your attention? • As you navigate, ask yourself:
1. What is the main message of this exhibition? What do I see that makes me say that? What narratives about the world, groups of people, democracy, progress, oppression, etc. is the exhibit putting forth? What message do the creators want me to take away from this experience? Are those the messages that I am taking away? Why or why not? Are there images that support the intended message by relying on problematic representations or naturalized ideologies? Which ones? HINT: this set of questions will help you develop your thesis statement.
2. Does the exhibition acknowledge or address National Geographic’s apology? If so, how?
3. In what ways does the exhibition reproduce the tropes of National Geographic discussed in Week 7?
HINT: Choose specific photographs and conduct a visual analysis like the ones we have been practicing in lectures. The guided viewing questions we used with the Migrant Mother photograph in Week 5’s lecture will be helpful). Are there ways in which this exhibition challenges the tropes discussed?
Exhibition Review: Communications & Media
Want help to write your Essay or Assignments? Click here
4. In what ways does the exhibition reproduce Orientalism? In what ways does it challenge Orientalism?
HINT: Choose specific photographs to analyze to support your answer. Do not write in generalities.
5. Did you notice any elements of institutional critique in the exhibition? Explain your answer.
6. What ideologies are promoted or embedded in this exhibition?
7. If Fred Wilson was asked to “mine” this museum exhibition (refer to Week 8), what do you think he would say/think/do? Imagine you have had the great fortune to be awarded an internship with the artist Fred Wilson. He has asked you to insert an object into the exhibition that uses juxtaposition to make a comment about the ideas presented.
What object or image would you insert? Write an exhibition label that explains what your juxtaposition exposes. What is your message?Structure and write your paper according to the following guidelines:
• Intro: Describe what you see as the main message of the exhibition and support your assertion with evidence from the exhibition’s images, design, texts, etc. Develop a thesis statement based on your answers to prompt #1 in the directions.
o HINT: a good thesis statement must be able to be supported with evidence from the exhibition and must be debatable. Being debatable means that it is non-obvious and you could reasonably argue against it. For instance, a bad thesis example would be “The TV show Kim’s Convenience tells the story of an immigrant family’s experiences in Canada” because it’s an obvious point that you cannot reasonably argue against.
A good thesis example would be: “Although the Royal BC Museum has attempted to return artifacts to Indigenous communities, its exhibitions continue to reinforce the idea that Indigenous culture is stuck in the past.” This sentence sets you up to support your argument with evidence and to make an interesting and non-obvious point about an exhibition.
Want help to write your Exhibition Review: Communications & Media Essay or Assignments? Click here
• Supporting paragraphs: Support your thesis statement with specific image examples from the exhibition. You should have at least three supporting paragraphs.
One paragraph must address at least one trope (see prompt #3 above).
One paragraph must address Orientalism (see prompt #4 above).
You may wish to include additional paragraphs that address the prompts above about apology and institutional critique or you may wish to spend multiple paragraphs identifying how additional tropes were used or avoided.
• Conclusion: Close your review by telling your reader what you would have included (one specific image or object that you find) and why. Make sure you tell your reader you are working in the tradition of Fred Wilson and include the text of your actual exhibition label as a separate appendix at the end of the review.
• Paper should be 3 full pages, not including exhibition label. Must be in 12pt Times New Roman Font, 1-inch margins, no extra spaces between paragraphs or elaborate schemes to space your words out.
Marking Rubric
Total points possible: 22
Please note: point amounts are the maximum you can earn for each component, which means getting the max points for any component requires a stellar job addressing it. Just doing something related to the component will not yield the max points. For instance, if you say, “the main message is about women,” that will be 0 points for the “main message” component because it is not specific and is obvious.
o Main message identified and supported – max 2 pts
o Thesis is appropriate to instructions and able to be debated and defended with evidence from the exhibition – max 3 pts
o Supporting paragraphs #1 and #2 (must follow instructions, choose specific images, analyze them appropriately using visual analysis methods from lectures, to get the max points examples must be convincing to the reader) – max 4pts per paragraph (8 total pts)
o Additional supporting paragraphs (relevant, well-argued and follows instructions) – max 2 pts total
o Conclusion – max 3 pts
o Exhibition label attachment – max 1 pt
o Follows formatting – max 1 pt o Overall impression, quality of paper and writing (good transitions, spelling, word choice, technical aspects of writing, components come together to form a coherent whole, thesis is supported) – max 2pts
Exhibition Review: Communications & Media
Want help to write your Essay or Assignments? Click here
Mary Tyler Moore Show: Depiction of How Powerless Women Are Movie Review
INSTRUCTIONS:
Pick two of the controversial/edgy scenes listed below, and explain in detail about what they have in common, how they exist in a dialectic. Do not pick two scenes from the same television show.
Mary Tyler Moore Show
Option 1: The scenes in which she asks for more pay
Option 2: the scenes in which the black sportscaster is thrust into the lead anchor position
Sex & The City:
Option 3: The scene in which Carrie has sex like a man
Option 4: The scenes in which Charlotte deals with locker room nudity
Girls:
Option 5: The two opening sex scenes
Option 6: The scene in the abortion clinic
Option 7: The scene at the end with the gynecological examination
Your response papers should have a clear thesis and be at least 450 words long.
Want help to write your Essay or Assignments? Click here
A few months after he became warden of Angola Prison, Louisiana State Penitentiary, the Warden of Angola Prison approached New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary with an unusual request. Known as the “bloodiest prison in America,” Angola was in trouble and Warden Cain envisioned a solution. He wanted to create a process of moral rehabilitation that began with a seminary education, training inmates to become faith leaders inside prison walls.
Please analyze: the long-standing rehabilitative ideal had collapsed, a demise that was sudden and advocated by conservatives and liberals alike.
Want help to write your Essay or Assignments? Click here
